![]() There was a programme to redecorate the home in place. People’s bedrooms were spacious and people were able to personalise them. Staff spoke positively about the training they received, but this was not always evident in how we observed people being cared for. People were having their needs assessed but changes were not always readily identified in people’s care records. People did not always receive the right support to maintain a healthy diet and care records were not robust enough to have oversight that people were receiving the correct diet. The providers track record at Cherry Tree House did not demonstrate that the required improvements could be effectively made and embedded at the service. The management team were responsive to feedback and took immediate action to investigate our findings and address any shortfalls and provide assurances. ![]() The systems in place to ensure oversight and drive ongoing improvement were in place but had not been effective in resolving all of the issues found at the last inspection or identifying further concerns found at this inspection. People’s experience of using this service and what we found ![]() All bedrooms are ensuite and there are a variety of communal areas on each floor including living and dining areas, adapted bathrooms and a shared garden, kitchen and laundry. At the time of our inspection there were 78 people using the service.Ĭare is provided across three floors, with two floors providing general nursing care and one floor providing specialised care for people living with dementia. The service provides support to older people, and people living with physical disabilities or dementia. During an inspection looking at part of the serviceĬherry Tree House is a residential care home providing personal and nursing care to up to 81 people. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |